The Clash Between Megastar and Director That Shook Bollywood
The much-anticipated film Sikandar, marking the collaboration between superstar Salman Khan and acclaimed director AR Murugadoss, has become one of Bollywood’s biggest disappointments of 2025. Following the film’s spectacular box office failure, a shocking controversy has erupted, with Murugadoss publicly blaming Salman Khan’s notorious late arrivals on set for the film’s production challenges and ultimate downfall. This revelation has sparked a fierce backlash from Salman’s devoted fan army and opened conversations about professionalism, accountability, and the complex dynamics of star-driven cinema in India.
The Director’s Revelations: Shooting Challenges with a Superstar
In a series of candid interviews given after Sikandar’s theatrical disappointment, AR Murugadoss pulled back the curtain on what he described as extremely challenging shooting conditions. The director revealed that Salman Khan typically arrived on set only by 8 PM, forcing the entire crew to adjust their schedules to the superstar’s unconventional timing .
This late start time created a domino effect of production complications:
- Day scenes shot at night: The team had to film daytime sequences during nighttime hours, requiring extensive use of VFX to create daylight effects for scenes actually shot in darkness.
- Impact on child actors: Murugadoss particularly highlighted how this schedule affected young performers, noting, “If there were four kids in a scene, we would have to shoot with them at 2 AM, even if it’s the shot of them returning from school! They would become tired by that time and usually dozed off.”
- Green screen reliance: The director mentioned that “almost everything was shot on green mat” due to these timing constraints, significantly increasing both the technical complexity and production costs.
Murugadoss summarized the experience by stating, “It’s not easy to shoot with a star,” explaining that his crew was accustomed to traditional early morning starts rather than the nighttime schedule Salman’s arrivals necessitated.
Fan Fury: Defending Salman Khan and Accusing Hypocrisy
Salman Khan’s massive fan base has reacted with outrage to Murugadoss’s comments, launching a fierce defense of their favorite star and accusing the director of blatant hypocrisy.
Key Points of Fan Backlash:
- Selective memory accusations: Fans have circulated earlier interviews where Murugadoss praised Salman’s professionalism, contrasting them with his recent critical comments. One fan tweeted, “Before the #Sikandar release: Working with #SalmanKhan is incredible. After disaster: Couldn’t match timings, language issue, execution failure. If Hypocrisy had a face.”
- Questioning directorial responsibility: Many supporters argued that as the “captain of the ship,” Murugadoss should have managed these challenges more effectively rather than blaming his lead actor after the fact.
- Deflecting from creative failures: Fans pointed to Murugadoss’s recent directorial track record, noting that his previous films with other superstars also underperformed, suggesting the director might be deflecting from his own creative shortcomings.
- Salman’s work ethic defense: Supporters highlighted Salman’s explanation of his unique schedule, where the actor had previously stated that while his “timings are different,” he maintains discipline once on set and doesn’t retreat to his vanity van or sit idle during shoots.
Table: AR Murugadoss’s Recent Directorial Track Record
| Film | Lead Star | Box Office Performance | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Darbar | Rajinikanth | Underperformed | 2020 |
| Spyder | Mahesh Babu | Underperformed | 2017 |
| Sikandar | Salman Khan | Flop | 2025 |
Sikandar’s Box Office Performance and Critical Reception
Despite high expectations and the powerful combination of Salman Khan’s star power and Murugadoss’s directorial pedigree, Sikandar proved to be a major box office disappointment.
Financial Performance:
- Production budget: Approximately ₹200 crore (one of the most expensive Indian films of 2025).
- Domestic collection: Only ₹110-121 crore in the Indian market.
- Worldwide total: Approximately ₹184-185 crore globally.
- Box office result: Declared a major flop given its substantial budget and the star power involved.
The critical reception was equally harsh, with reviewers panning the film for its “outdated South Indian tropes,” “weak narrative,” and “underdeveloped execution.” Even Salman Khan’s performance came under fire, with one review noting he “graces the screen looking like he’s about to get admitted in a hospital” and criticizing his “monotone acting.”
The Bigger Picture: Accountability, Scheduling, and Bollywood Dynamics
This controversy touches on several perennial issues within the Indian film industry:
Star Power vs. Directorial Vision
The clash highlights the ongoing tension between megastars’ preferences and directors’ creative processes. While stars bring guaranteed box office draw, their working styles can significantly impact production.
The VFX Solution
The extensive use of VFX to compensate for scheduling challenges represents both a technical achievement and a potential concern about compromising authenticity for convenience.
Post-Failure Accountability
Murugadoss’s decision to publicly discuss production challenges after the film’s failure raises questions about industry norms regarding responsibility and blame-sharing when projects underperform .
Fan Culture and Defense Mechanisms
The intense reaction from Salman’s fans demonstrates the powerful role fan armies play in shaping narratives around their favorite stars and defending them against perceived criticisms.
Table: Sikandar’s Production Challenges and Impacts
| Challenge | Impact on Production | Solution Attempted |
|---|---|---|
| Late shoot starts | Day scenes needed to be filmed at night | Extensive VFX to create daylight effects |
| Child actor scheduling | Young performers fatigued during late shoots | Adjustment of scenes, possible compromises |
| Green screen reliance | Increased technical complexity and costs | Pushed the boundaries of VFX capabilities |
Director’s Self-Reflection and Acknowledgement of Shortcomings
Despite his comments about the challenging shooting conditions, Murugadoss has also taken some responsibility for Sikandar’s failure. The director acknowledged that the emotional story—which revolves around a man tracking down recipients of his late wife’s donated organs—wasn’t effectively executed on screen.
He compared the project to his earlier success Ghajini, noting, “I could pull off Ghajini because it was a remake, not an original script. I had already done it before, so I had complete command. With Sikandar, that wasn’t the case.” This admission suggests that beyond the scheduling challenges, the director may have struggled with the original Hindi content and connecting with the audience’s sensibilities.
Conclusion: Lessons from a Bollywood Breakdown
The Salman Khan AR Murugadoss controversy surrounding Sikandar offers a fascinating glimpse into the complex dynamics of big-budget filmmaking in India. While scheduling challenges and star preferences are nothing new in Bollywood, the public nature of this fallout—and the vehement response from fans—highlights how the industry continues to grapple with balancing star power, directorial vision, and practical production realities.
As both Salman Khan and AR Murugadoss move forward from this professional setback, the industry will be watching to see how this very public disagreement influences future collaborations between major stars and directors. One thing remains certain: in today’s hyper-connected world, where both production secrets and post-mortem analyses quickly become public discourse, the traditional boundaries between on-screen drama and off-screen realities are increasingly blurred.
The Sikandar controversy serves as a reminder that in modern filmmaking, success requires not just creative vision and star power, but also effective collaboration, adaptability, and perhaps most importantly—a shared commitment to owning both triumphs and failures alike.
What do you think about this controversy? Was the director right to speak up, or should production challenges remain behind closed doors? Share your perspective in the comments below!
For more news updates, Visit Newsneck.
